Discussion (2)
Grab this poll for your site
Votes cast anywhere this poll is embedded count toward the same live total.
From Groundbeat
Help us build thisWe're building the Groundbeat community one person at a time, and we need your help — if you know someone who belongs here, please send them groundbeat.com.
More in News & Politics
- Should the 2026 midterm results be treated as a verdict on President Trump? · 6 votes
- Were Missouri voters right to block the state's Republican-drawn congressional map? · 1 votes
- Were Idaho voters right to reject the ballot measure and keep the state's abortion ban? · 1 votes
- Should the U.S. fund a high-speed rail network? · 1 votes
While it is currently too high, it will cost us to undo the damage Trump and Hegeseth have done, plus we need to invest heavily into the new world of drones, both in the use of them, how to deploy them in the field, and also how to defend against them. It is an arms race that has barely begun. While on the subject of drones and budget, need to be VERY careful about making things that kill people autonomous. Very trecherous and slippery slope with the understanding that no AI should be making choices involving lives. I would rather trust old fashioned software, and very limited applications of AI for pattern matching. Drones include flying, walking, driving, boats and submarines.
Agree there's going to be some undoing needed. Battleships? Steam catapults? He's pulling our military back into the last century. As far as the future of warfare, we're moving into uncharted territory with AI. And smart drones / swarms are making much of our legacy hardware highly vulnerable. I'm not sure how we'll defend a $15B aircraft carrier from a swarm of smart, inexpensive drones. We're going to have to be much more agile in how we invest and deploy in the future.