Discussion (3)
Grab this poll for your site
Votes cast anywhere this poll is embedded count toward the same live total.
From Groundbeat
Help us build thisWe're building the Groundbeat community one person at a time, and we need your help — if you know someone who belongs here, please send them groundbeat.com.
More in News & Politics
- Should the 2026 midterm results be treated as a verdict on President Trump? · 6 votes
- Were Missouri voters right to block the state's Republican-drawn congressional map? · 1 votes
- Were Idaho voters right to reject the ballot measure and keep the state's abortion ban? · 1 votes
- Should the U.S. fund a high-speed rail network? · 1 votes
Rather I would clearly differentiate the Capitol, from the area known as Washington DC, or any other adjustments that would allow the residents of the area to become a state and have proper representation in congress. There have been constitutional arguments in the past to block DC statehood. Moving the Capital would result in the entire infrastructure of the Federal government centered in DC being compelled to move with it. While the Capital can be located anywhere, I see no reason for it to move.
Don't get this question. Is there any reason to do this?
Moving the capital means picking a new host city to inherit the traffic, security zones, and lobbyist real estate. Which city do you nominate, and does it actually fix anything or just relocate the mess?