Discussion (6)
Grab this poll for your site
Votes cast anywhere this poll is embedded count toward the same live total.
From Groundbeat
Help us build thisWe're building the Groundbeat community one person at a time, and we need your help — if you know someone who belongs here, please send them groundbeat.com.
More in News & Politics
- Should the 2026 midterm results be treated as a verdict on President Trump? · 6 votes
- Were Missouri voters right to block the state's Republican-drawn congressional map? · 1 votes
- Were Idaho voters right to reject the ballot measure and keep the state's abortion ban? · 1 votes
- Should the U.S. fund a high-speed rail network? · 1 votes
I wouldn't say age limit, but maybe cognitive testing.
It's not fair and it misses the target; it would, for example, rule out Bernie Sanders yet keep John Fetterman eligible. Real people are unique, differences within groups outweigh differences between them, and that alone prevents these blanket-category judgments from ever being fair.
Agreed. I don't understand support for rules that limit our future choices. Do we really need protection from ourselves?
When it comes to public policy, "One Size Fits All" is as red as any flag can get.
If you say yes, what's the cutoff and why that number instead of just letting voters decide case by case every election.
I really dislike these AI driven engagement bait questions